There are 5 comments - Display All Comments
RaySchmit
z
rochester, mn
Posted on 11/4/2009 at 11:06:15 AM
Not to quibble over small technicalities like the law, but the process is for the council to recommend to the charter commission that the commission repeal the provision. Depending on the choice of process that may then require a vote. Funny how the administration finds the charter important when it suits them and forgets provisions when it doesn’t.
mgse
Rochester, MN
Posted on 11/4/2009 at 11:57:11 AM
“the founding document of the city which serves roughly the same role on the local level as the U.S. Constitution does the country.”
That is funny and sad, all at the same time. Much as the federal govt ignores the Constitution, the city ignores its charter.
eeleel
Rochester, mn
Getalife
Rochester, MN
Posted on 11/4/2009 at 1:47:35 PM
If the civic center can’t support itself then it should not have an expansion. Lets put the money into something that matters. ie schools roads lower our taxes.
Derf
Rochester, MN
Posted on 11/4/2009 at 4:15:25 PM
This article is factually incorrect. The Council has yet to take action to repeal that Charter provision. The Council was asked in the agenda item description to request the Charter Commission to consider an amendment to the Charter that would delete any reference to the tax. Once the Commission has considered the matter, one of the alternatives is that the proposed amendment can be sent back to the Council to be considered for adoption by the Council by adoption of an ordinance. If such an ordinance is adopted by the Council (and it would have to be adopted by a unanimous vote of that body) then the Charter would be amended.

E-mail Story
Print Story
