p0607 BC-ChallengingMichelle 1stLd-Writethru 11-28 0862
Defining the job has challenged first ladies
Eds: Corrects lead sequence; ADDS photo links;. Moving on general news and financial services.
AP Photo WX208, WX209
By DARLENE SUPERVILLE
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) — Among the many challenges Michelle Obama will face as first lady, the biggest may be defining the job.
And therein lies the problem: Her newest high-profile job isn’t a job, per se.
The Founding Fathers made no provision for the first lady in the Constitution, and no formal or official description exists. The first lady is neither elected nor appointed, but comes along with the president, for better or worse.
Nor is she paid for all that’s required of her.
Many a first lady has said, in retrospect, that she had no idea how hard being first lady would be. Even the current one, Laura Bush, according to author and first lady historian Betty Caroli.
Of all the first ladies, she should have known what was in store: Her mother-in-law, Barbara, was first lady from 1989-1993.
"So no matter I suppose how well prepared ... she’s probably going to be surprised by the enormity of the publicity, the focus, the demands and so forth," Caroli said of Michelle Obama.
The first lady gets an office in the White House, typically the East Wing — though Hillary Rodham Clinton caused a stir when she famously planted herself in the West Wing among the heavy-hitting honchos of her husband’s administration.
There’s also a staff to help plan and execute the many social functions held every year at the country’s most famous residence, and to help her promote her chosen causes.
Still, the job description is ill-defined, said Robert P. Watson, who has written two books about first ladies and directs the American studies program at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Fla.
"The first lady has to find her own way and match that with her husband’s interests," Watson said.
So like most people in a loosely defined job, first ladies have made of it what they’ve made of it, from the traditionalists like Mamie Eisenhower and Bess Truman, to the politically active like Eleanor Roosevelt and Hillary Clinton.
First ladies have a certain freedom, then, but only to a point: For all the talk of the Obamas changing Washington, Michelle Obama, cannot, for instance, say "no" to presiding over the annual Easter Egg Roll, which dates to 1878.
Laura Bush once said she didn’t see herself as a certain type of first lady.
"I view my role as first lady as Laura Bush," she told the Dallas Morning News in November 2001, near the end of her husband’s first year in office. "I really do think that Americans want the first lady to do whatever it is she wants to do."
And Laura Bush did.
She started slow, with a traditional focus on reading and education, befitting a former teacher and school librarian. But she broadened her interests and became more politically active as the years passed. She has traveled alone through the Middle East, Europe and Africa, has championed the rights of Afghan women and has been a frequent, public critic of Myanmar’s military government.
Michelle Obama has said her first priority is to help her two young daughters make the adjustment to a new way of life. But many suspect a high-achiever like Michelle Obama won’t sit idle for long.
"The primary focus for the first year will be making sure that the kids make it through the transition. But there are many issues that I care deeply about," she told "60 Minutes," singling out military families, work-family balance, education and the Washington community. "So there’s plenty to do."
And to be criticized for.
There’s the other rub for first ladies: All have met with criticism at one point or another, usually for something they did, said or wore.
Michelle Obama has endured her share already. She still hasn’t lived down the moment when she seemed to suggest that she had not as an adult been proud of her country until she saw the public’s reaction to her husband’s candidacy, said Quinetta Roberson, a Villanova University business professor.
"People will be watching to see that patriotism," said Roberson, who co-wrote a law journal article on the challenges awaiting Michelle Obama.
She’ll be under the microscope for other things, too, with everyone watching, for example, her clothes, how she styles her hair, how she decorates the White House for Christmas and how much money she spends on this or that.
It’s all part of the delicate balancing act for first ladies, who must tiptoe between being traditional and activist at the same time.
Said Watson: "You can’t go out too far one way or the other."