Sponsored By
An organization or individual has paid for the creation of this work but did not approve or review it.



Analysis: Gun bill never had a chance

Family members of those lost in the Newtown, Conn. school shooting, Mark and Jackie Barden, with their children Natalie and James, who lost Daniel; Nicole Hockley, mother of Dylan, upper left, and and Jeremy Richman, father of Avielle in the back, stand together as President Barack Obama speaks in the Rose Garden of the White House, Wednesday, April 17, 2013, in Washington. Obama spoke about measures to reduce gun violence and a bill to expand background checks on guns that was defeated in the Senate. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

WASHINGTON — President Obama, his face set with rage, stood in the Rose Garden surrounded by the families of Newtown and former RepresentativeGabrielle Giffords and asked how a measure to expand background checks for gun buyers — one supported by an overwhelming majority of Americans and a bipartisan majority of the Senate — had slipped away.

"The American people are trying to figure out," Mr. Obama said, "how can something have 90 percent support and yet not happen?"

The answer: The measure never really had a chance.

In the nearly 10 years since the expiration of the assault weapons ban, even modest gun safety legislation has proved impossible to advance on Capitol Hill, where the momentum has been in the other direction, with lawmakers pushing various expansions of gun rights. The 68 votes last week to allow the debate on gun legislation to proceed was a mirage, a temporary triumph granted by senators willing to allow shooting victims and their survivors the vote they sought with absolutely no intention of supporting the final legislation and crossing the gun lobby or constituents who see gun rights as a defining issue.

While the opening vote provided advocates a glimmer of hope, the Newtown shootings, the tearful pleas of the parents of killed children and an aggressive push by the president could not turn the tide. They were no match for the reason Democrats have avoided gun control fights for years: a combination of the political anxiety of vulnerable Democrats from conservative states, deep-seated Republican resistance and the enduring clout of the National Rifle Association.


At a moment when the national conversation about how best to stem the menace of guns in the wrong hands seemed to have shifted, it turned out that the political dynamic had not.

Republicans armed themselves with disputed talking points from the gun lobby about how a bill to expand background checks and outlaw a national gun registry was instead tantamount to a national gun registry. Turning the dispute from gun safety to gun rights, they took to the Senate floor to denounce the compromise, even arguing with its sponsors, Senator Joe Manchin III, Democrat of West Virginia, and Patrick Toomey, Republican of Pennsylvania, two National Rifle Association-blessed lawmakers who could not contain their umbrage. Obama on Wednesday accused the gun lobby and opposition lawmakers of willfully lying about the measure.

Yet unlike fiscal fights, in which there are clear partisan divides, just enough Democrats broke with their party to make a difference. While the measure enjoyed the support of a broad swath of Democrats, the four who voted against it were just enough to give Republicans the numbers for the bill's demise, along with the political cover that it was a bipartisan decision.

As for the NRA, while some saw the group's leader, Wayne LaPierre, as meandering and on defense after the Connecticut school shootings in December, seasoned lawmakers heard something far more telling: the group, which once supported new background checks, would no longer abide them. As a result, before a single hearing, bill or speech on the Senate floor, the legislation was in grave trouble. Then the Gun Owners of America chimed in, attacking Republican senators who showed any interest in compromise, arguing that a national gun registry would arise from the bill.

The Senate's rapid dismissal of what just weeks ago seemed the most achievable goal — a measure to extend background checks to gun buyers not currently covered by the federal system — sent the question of how and if to regulate firearms back to the states, where new laws both to restrain and expand gun rights are now fermenting.

The vote was also a warning to lawmakers who have embarked on the precarious bipartisan search for new immigration laws; while the issues are politically distinct, the process of melding a host of values on an emotional issue can be easily derailed. And the White House, unable to deliver 60 votes for a centerpiece of its agenda with 55 Democratically controlled seats, enters the immigration debate potentially weakened.

Democrats are counting on Mr. Obama's rage to spread through the nation, and are hoping to eke out a political and eventually legislative victory.

"There are very few things that 90 percent of American agree on," said Senator Harry Reidof Nevada, the majority leader, who vowed that the fight for the measure was not over.


"This is just the beginning," said Reid, who invoked a procedural tactic that would enable him to bring up the bill again. "It is not the end."

Glaze said his group's campaign would start anew on Thursday. "I am not sure the American people have recently been treated to such a stark display of frank dishonesty," he said. "You have grown men making statements that they plainly know to be false reading directly from talking points from a gun lobby that plainly knows them to be false. Helping speed that conversion along is our job, and we will begin that process tomorrow."

But the fierce lobby against gun control believes the battle is over for now.

"We feel confident this will spell the end of gun control for the 113th Congress," said Michael Hammond, the legislative counsel for Gun Owners of America, based in Virginia. "The gun registry defined the battle over universal background checks."

Gun control backers: Senate defeat won't stop us

What To Read Next
Get Local