ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Other View: Berkeley group pushes a ban on pro-Israel speakers

Students at Cal, or any other campus, have a right to their own beliefs, of course. But the BDS movement veers dangerously close to antisemitism in its highly selective outrage.

thomas-berkeley-20221004
Sather Gate at UC Berkeley.
Dreamstime
We are part of The Trust Project.

The sad state of free speech on America’s college campuses has been well-documented. Now a controversy at a top California institution shines a light on how on one such effort to stifle opposing viewpoints has intersected with antisemitism.

In late August, as students were returning to the University of California, Berkeley, a group called Law Students for Justice in Palestine urged other campus organizations to support a bylaw condemning Israel and to pledge not to invite speakers who back the Jewish state. The move was in support of the woefully misguided Boycott, Divest, Sanction movement, now popular in some progressive circles, that seeks to blame Israel, the region’s only democracy and a staunch American ally, for all the problems in the Middle East.

Also Read
Rhodes and his minions, outfitted in combat-type gear, stashed weapons at a Virginia hotel as part of a “Quick Reaction Force” they could activate if necessary on Jan. 6. Then they descended on the
Support local businesses. Revisit the shops you haven't entered for a year or two, and explore some new shopping and dining options. These places need customers, and dollars spent locally support
China is the world’s second-largest economy and Xi’s “zero-COVID” policy is rattling economies across the globe because, once again, the lack of transparency and freedom crushes all free market

This type of bylaw is common among today’s leftist campus authoritarians who, in the name of promoting diversity, seek to quash dissent and impose a mind-numbing conformity of thought. This is not only an affront to the mission of higher education, it also betrays the obvious intellectual cowardice at work among those who prefer censorship to robust debate.

In response to the proposed bylaw, some critics accused the university of developing “Jewish-Free Zones.” That may be a bit of an exaggeration, but not by much. Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of Berkeley law, noted that only nine of 100 student groups had adopted the proposal and that no group has excluded a speaker over his or her views on Israel.

Yet nine is nine too many. And Chemerinsky acknowledged the breadth of the proposal, pointing out that, under the bylaw, “I could not be invited to speak because I support the existence of Israel.” Imagine how Jewish students on campus would feel.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chemerinsky also correctly pointed out that the “First Amendment does not allow us to exclude any viewpoints, and I believe that it is crucial that universities be places where all ideas can be voiced and discussed.”

That this needs to be said at all should trigger alarm bells.

Students at Cal, or any other campus, have a right to their own beliefs, of course. But the BDS movement veers dangerously close to antisemitism in its highly selective outrage. While cloaking itself in high-minded terms such as “justice” and “peace,” its ultimate goal, some observers believe, is to dissolve the Jewish state. The fact that BDS supporters would brazenly seek to banish from Berkeley speakers who have other views on the issue highlights the totalitarian tendencies of progressive extremism while showcasing how free speech has become endangered at America’s universities.

©2022 Las Vegas Review-Journal
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

What to read next
At the climate summit, the Saudi delegation pulled out all the stops to ensure that fossil fuels didn’t get blamed for the wildfires across the Western United States and Western Europe, or East
There’s no good reason that they shouldn’t be bound by the same ethics rules as the rest of the judiciary.
Poll after poll through the years show that most Americans want DACA recipients to be allowed to remain legally in the U.S.
Under the clear language of the law, the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, along with the Senate Finance Committee chair and Joint Committee on Taxation chair, can see anyone’s federal