Other View: Congress must reach a consensus on election reform

Do whatever is necessary to protect the will of the people.

The U.S. Capitol Building in Washington, D.C. Congress must pass a measure to overhaul the Electoral Count Act.
We are part of The Trust Project.

Democracy-preserving changes to the outdated 1887 Electoral Count Act, passed at a time when legislators couldn’t imagine a situation like the shameful events that led up to the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, must be approved by Congress. The question now is whether that will be the version passed last week by the House , the version introduced in the Senate, or something in between.

There’s no doubt that the House version is more robust. It lays out five specific categories of reasons why an objection to a state’s electors might be raised by Congress and would require at least a third of each chamber to support the raising of such an objection, plus a majority vote to substantiate it; the Senate version would only require a fifth of members to raise an objection.

Also Read
Support local businesses. Revisit the shops you haven't entered for a year or two, and explore some new shopping and dining options. These places need customers, and dollars spent locally support local jobs and the local economy.
China is the world’s second-largest economy and Xi’s “zero-COVID” policy is rattling economies across the globe because, once again, the lack of transparency and freedom crushes all free market instincts.
At the climate summit, the Saudi delegation pulled out all the stops to ensure that fossil fuels didn’t get blamed for the wildfires across the Western United States and Western Europe, or East Coast hurricanes, or massive flooding that affected more than 33 million Pakistanis.

Yet these are details, and both versions substantially tighten up what are currently far too permissive standards for both Congress and state governments to interfere with elections. On the most significant and fundamental points, such as eliminating the ability for state legislatures to throw out slates simply by declaring an election to be “failed,” the House and Senate are in lockstep, and they must now work together to get these important shifts over the finish line.

The House’s rush to pass a version that the bipartisan group of legislators hashing it out in the Senate don’t seem particularly enthused about certainly hasn’t helped, but the bill’s trajectory is far from derailed. Sen. Susan Collins, one of the lead negotiators, reiterated her commitment to getting some form of the bill finalized while keeping the 11 GOP senators currently signed on. That’s vital, given that 60 votes are the threshold to accomplish almost anything in the Senate.

If the price is slightly watering down the stricter tenets of the House-passed bill, so be it. Without concrete action soon, the entire democratic electoral process that put these policymakers in office and imbues them with power on behalf of the public is in jeopardy. Do whatever is necessary to protect the will of the people.


©2022 New York Daily News
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

What to read next
There’s no good reason that they shouldn’t be bound by the same ethics rules as the rest of the judiciary.
Poll after poll through the years show that most Americans want DACA recipients to be allowed to remain legally in the U.S.
Under the clear language of the law, the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, along with the Senate Finance Committee chair and Joint Committee on Taxation chair, can see anyone’s federal returns, but Trump has fought Neal’s request for the filings since 2019. And Tuesday, the law prevailed and Trump lost.
“Globalization has brought more people out of poverty than any other –ism,” Bono said. “If somebody comes to me with a better idea, I’ll sign up."