ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Letter: Approval for solar panels through Xcel Energy isn't short

Letter to the Editor graphic
We are part of The Trust Project.

Last fall my wife and I decided to have solar electric panels installed on our river cottage in Wabasha. We contracted with All Energy Solar and proceeded to ascertain the site and suitability of roof support. A building permit was required and it was obtained after a septic system inspection.

Originally we were told the panels could be installed by this June 2022. Occasionally, in the last few weeks I would receive from Xcel Energy, the grid provider, a notice that the application was incomplete, but All Energy Solar communicated with Xcel and I was told all was in order.

Also Read
The first “paid” rounds of golf occurred on May 8, 1927 and I hope it continues in operation as an 18-hole course for another 100 years. My review of the report prepared by National Golf Foundation (NGF) on the city golf courses noted no justification to reduce it to a nine-hole course or to even consider closing the Soldiers Golf Course.
After my review of the 136-page report on the city-owned golf courses prepared by National Golf Foundation (NGF), I note no justification to reduce the number of golf holes or to consider closing Soldiers Golf Course.

I just received from Xcel Energy a notice that there were four applications ahead of mine in the application process which they say takes up to 240 days for each of the proceeding four applications. That means, by my calculations, it could take over three years to complete the application process, never mind installation.

I have friends and family who, in other areas, including Rochester, have had panels installed in two to three weeks. I don’t know what the issue is with Xcel, but I have several theories. Delays, which would reduce the grid provider’s income, should not be allowed to thwart climate friendly energy access.

Fredric Kleinberg, Rochester

Related Topics: LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
What to read next
This letter is in response to a letter written by Craig Martens published in the June 28 edition of the Post Bulletin. I have a point of clarification to his last paragraph. In 1926, Dr. Graham did NOT give this land to the City of Rochester. It is a fact, however, that he did own the land but it was purchased by the American Legion Post 92 of Rochester in 1924 from Dr. Christopher Graham.
Minnesota has a multi-billion-dollar surplus. Minnesota residents need help.
I believe we are best served to let the golf resurgence play out rather than assume it will fade to pre-pandemic numbers.
Referring to the Supreme Court reversal of Roe v Wade's impact on Minnesota, Rep. Tina Liebling said, "If the Legislature were to suddenly be all Republican, if the governor was Republican, we could be Texas in a year."