Letter: Line 3 would give economy a boost

Project's value has been proven over and over.

Letter to the Editor graphic
We are part of The Trust Project.

Big decisions need to be made in order to help the future of Northern Minnesota. The COVID-19 pandemic has hurt this part of the state more than most areas. With people stuck inside due to restrictions, the yearly tourism boost that usually helps us here has drastically dropped off.

One thing the state could do to help us here – without having to raise taxes - is to commit to large construction projects that are ready to go, like the Line 3 Replacement Project.

The Line 3 Replacement Project should already be under construction. Its value has been proven over and over, yet it is still being held up by bureaucrats playing politics.

This oil needs to be transported safely, and this project will bring more than 4,000 jobs and $2 billion to Northern Minnesota. Enbridge has committed to transporting oil the safest way possible through Minnesota on their own dime.

Now it is time for Gov. Walz and other state agencies to stop delaying things and commit to helping the people of Northern Minnesota.


Greg J. Gallas, Rochester

What to read next
The latest bill passed by the U.S. Senate is an example of the overreach by the Democrats while they have a very slim majority in the Congress with an incompetent President and a do-nothing, giggling VP.
For decades, the Sisters of St. Francis have placed a Gospel Social Justice message on their fence facing 14th Street Northwest. There has NEVER been any vandalism.
The NGF Study stated that if Soldiers Field Golf Course is closed, 15,000 of approximately 30,000 rounds currently played there would be lost. The remaining 15,000 rounds could be played at the other city courses. Data suggests we play May through October with shoulder seasons in April and November. Those few months host all high school events, fundraising tournaments, leagues, league events and championships, as well as open play.
Killing deer in parks … disgusting and contrary to the “expert opinion”, not safe or imperative.