Letter: Why should we all pay for golf courses?

Letter to the Editor graphic
We are part of The Trust Project.

Why is the Rochester City Council even thinking about dedicating $250,000 dollars a year in property tax revenue for the golf program? The poor people who can't play golf or don't want to play should not have their property tax increase so some richer people can play golf.

This should be a user fee instead of a tax increase. Our taxes are way too high now without subsidizing a golf program. The new council should be thinking of ways for better use of our tax money than playing golf.

Joseph Laughton Sr., Rochester

What To Read Next
While reading the headlines on the Saturday, Jan. 21, Post Bulletin, I thought I was reading the tabloids! Certainly, you could have chosen a more current, caring, or interesting story for your headline article.
In reference to the Post Bulletin article of Jan. 20, 2023, titled “Science of the snow day…”
Last week the Park Board approved the Soldiers Field Park “Alternative Plan” – bending to the golf lobby – which will develop a “nature play zone” and add parking west of Gibbs Drive. Currently the land is the William M. Van Hook Gardens* and is used in various ways like picnicking, reading, and visiting friends. Its tranquil and flexible utility is the point. Should we really develop the only corner of Soldiers Field Park where an activity isn’t prescribed to us? It’s my view that our parks should offer a balance of amenities and quiet spaces.
The U.S. House appears headed to take our country and the global economy into chaos. They refuse to raise the debt ceiling to authorize payment of debts already incurred in exchange for brutal cuts in vital programs across the board (like Social Security and Medicare).